Ban on smoking in public places

Since the beginning of civilization, man has continuously persuaded his interests for recreation by using tobacco as a frontline capacity for his leisure time. As time passed by, more production of tobacco started till it reached a stage where directly there are numerous cigarette companies selling their crab louse sticks at the most reasonable rates. The desire to light a cigarette has always been one of the top most priorities of people who indulge in pot and in their pretext of soothing their desire for a grass they more often than not forget the measuring rod of hazard and trouble caused by the smoke emitting from their cigarettes.Cigarette green goddess is one of the defeat ways of self destruction and even after knowing its negative impact on the body, a smoker always executes to overlook the danger associated with it and continues to smoke irrespective of the location in which he is standing. The issue of raising a ban on pot in normal has always been a controvers ial one and has always been taking the side of a non-smoker than people who are indulgent in public smoking. Non- smokers always tend to move away from a location where a smoker is footing and always have a feeling of their sentiments being abused or lose by a person who is smoking pricy them.The history of the smoking ban can be dated to the sixteenth century when the Pope urban VII made it mandatory uprightness of smokers not being welcomed near the premises of the church and also issues a penalty for people who violated this law. This law however did not catch as much worry as the issue is catching on the twenty-first century. Today because of the advancements of medical science and look on the unbecoming effects of smoking, we have been able to pin point the negative impacts of smoking on a smoker and the passive smoker near by to him.The following will shed some light on the physical negative impacts of smoking on a smoker Smoking causes lung cancer, spunk disease, emphy sema, complicated pregnancy. Smoking by pregnant women result in fetal injury, premature birth, and low birth weight. Smoking is associated with a reduced bone smoke and an increased risk of osteoporosis (Courtesy Cheap Cigarettes, Effects of Cigarette Smoking. Retrieved on celestial latitude 2, 2008 from http//www. cheap-cigarettes. com/Effects_of_Cigarette_Smoking. asp)There are evidences too on the fact of smoking affecting spotlight operational procedures, especially related with ones in which transfusion of blood is on a higher side because of the attempt to join bones or tissues which callable to accidents and other trauma are disarrayed from each other. Apart from knowing these entire statistics a persistent smoker would continue to smoke and silently suppress his body, but for that soothing experience the smoker might make some innocent bystander a partner of his misery, by making him a passive smoker.The second gear hand smoke in tangled by a passive smoker is conside red to very dangerous and it causes a readiness more harm and eventuality than what it looks at the moment. The worst effect however of passive smoking is on children, and the following evidence will vindicate the point of having smoking bans in public places due to its adverse effects on children Exposure to tobacco smoke doubles the chances of your child for illnesses like bronchitis, bronchiolitis, and pneumonia. They are also more likely to suffer from ear infections (glue ear), tonsillitis, and asthma. It whitethorn damage a childs olfactory function (Courtesy Passive smoking.Retrieved on December 2, 2008 from http//www. stopsmokingtoday. com/dync/13/Passive_Smoking. html) Legislators and law makers understood the total provocation being inhaled by passive smoking and brought the necessary amendments to the laws of the state by banning smoking in public places. The need for the law to amend was felt by lot of people who were unnecessarily being forced to hazardous health condi tions for no fault of their own. Smoking which were rampant in leisure places like pubs and restaurants were the most harmful, as a majority of people have a habit of smoking along with taking intakes of alcohol.This nature of these smokers brought the non smoking populace visiting such leisure outlets in very uncomfortable positions and in one way brought an infringement of the constitution to these victims of passive smoking. There was a nationwide applause for the banning of smoking in public places and a majority of the nation was giving it thumbs up and also considered it an important decision which was taken to curb smokers from spreading any amount chances of passive smoking to non smokers. The following evidence will shed light on the nations opinion of having a smoking ban in public placesGallups 2004 consumption habits survey reveals that the American public is fairly accepting of such ban. A majority of 58%Americans currently say they raise a ban in their state that woul d make it illegal to smoke in workplaces, restaurants and bars. (Courtesy Alec M. Gallup, Frank Newport , The Gallup Poll Public tactile sensation 2004 .Page 306. Retrieved on December 2, 2008. Gallup Organization. Published by Rowman & Littlefield, 2006) There are a lot of advantages that can be grouped with the banning of smoking in public places.Firstly a commuter train or a non smoker can have fresh whiffs of air without the mixture of tobacco endorsed smoke hovering around. Secondly the ban itself makes the smoker smoke less(prenominal) which in turn is helping him from reducing the health hazards which he would eventually inflict on himself over the period of time. The ban on smoking in one way slows raft the process of self damage that smokers tend to endure with their constant puffing. It has estimated that around thousands of Americans die every year due to quick and passive smoking, and the ban would definitely help the figure of passive smoking by a great extent.The ba n comes with a whooping of $50 for the first misdemeanor and $75 for repetitive violations. This becomes more deterrent for an active smoker and eventually brings him on the brink of leaving the habit or the least bringing down his no. of cigarettes by a good amount. Another big advantage related with the ban, is that the risk of fire catching up in factories or other places to due to a burning cigarette is greatly reduced and it brings the work place into a much safer and a cleaner zone. Also it helps saves the energy consumed by ventilators that are required to recycle the air in such places.However there are certain sets of disadvantages of such a ban too and the most immemorial one is they way smokers get into more hazardous situations in smoking zones. Here due to a large amount of smoke gathering the airing is slower which results in itchiness of the eyes and other lung problems because of the amount of passive smoking inhaled by active smokers. This somehow gives smokers a second class intervention as it becomes acceptable for the government for non smokers not to undergo minimal passive smoking but to allow massive passive smoking for active smokers in such zones.A lot of restaurants and bars feel the crunch as their smoking customers refrain from coming to them and thus it bring a drop to their turnovers. In todays high stress working atmospheres, employees are feeling more frustrated as somehow the tension which they could feel being released by their smoking has been feverously curbed. Smoking ban is one of the most righteous decisions of the government helping non smokers from the unwanted dangers of nicotine filled smokes.However when the law was being implemented not much attention has been given to smokers rights and at times it is becoming a little hypocritical situation. Nevertheless the main objective of such a ban bring stake a life to their citizens which could be void of at least one addiction and would be more fruitful to them in ter ms of having a hale and hearty standard of living. Reference 1) Cheap Cigarettes, Effects of Cigarette Smoking. http//www. cheap-cigarettes. com/Effects_of_Cigarette_Smoking. asp 2) Passive smoking. http//www. stopsmokingtoday. com/dync/13/Passive_Smoking.html 3) Alec M. Gallup, Frank Newport , The Gallup Poll Public Opinion 2004. Gallup Organization. Published by Rowman & Littlefield, 2006 4) http//www. notosmoke. com/herbal-smoking-articles/pros-and%20cons-of-smoking-ban. htm 5) BRADLEY S. KLAPPER, WHO Urges Smoking Ban in Public Places. May 29, 2007. http//rds. yahoo. com/_ylt=A0geu.. NnTVJvk8BvQdXNyoA_ylu=X3oDMTEyamNvY2Y3BHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDNQRjb2xvA2FjMgR2dGlkA0Y4NjJfOTM-/SIG=13u9q6ff9/EXP=1228336909/**http%3a//www. sfgate. com/cgi-bin/article. cgi%3ff=/n/a/2007/05/29/international/i122741D62. DTL%26type=politics