Of Little Importance :: essays research papers

Of Little ImportanceIn Alain DeBottons obligate The Shame of Failure she writes that Our sense of an appropriate limit to achievement and riches is never decided independently. She continues to say that we ask others their thoughts on our lives and we are ceaselessly comparing ourselves to the successes of others. DeBotton sees this behavior as normal, acceptable. I believe that achievement and wealth is decided by the individual.DeBotton says that Ameri lots cod the freedom to choose their lifestyle and in doing so can comparatively be better than or worsened than other Americans. In order to solve this ongoing dilemma, DeBotton suggests that people can choose to either make to a greater extent m one(a)y or declare their desires. She goes on to say that modern societies have succeeded spectacularly at the first, solelyhave negated their achievements. Americans do fight to attain wealth, but will non say no to their desires.I do not believe that one can solve this status anxie ty by making more money or restraining desires. Any given person will have desires for simple to ludicrous things. Money is a fact of life, a necessity. To sterilise status anxiety I believe that you should stop inflicting importance on not-so-important things. Why does you job make you a bad person? It doesnt. each job has importance and the key to fixing this is to make wages more equal. Why should the athlete who just plays a game all day be allowed to make millions when a teacher who gets these kids through to the real domain of a function makes a meager $30,000? (Starting teaching salary according to www.aft.org/salary/) high society brought itself to these standards and we are now unhappy with them. I also believe that their actually should not be a problem with status. What does it matter if you make $25,000 a year and are a divorced father of 4 with a 1987 Jeep Wagoneer?